Corrections Policy

Accuracy is a responsibility

After Asr aims to publish work that is careful, fair, and factual. If we get something wrong, we correct it clearly. If new verified information emerges, we update responsibly. This page explains what to report, how to report it, and what you can expect from us.

Last Updated: February 9, 2026 Site: AfterAsr.com Contact: [email protected]
01 Report clearly

Send the article link, exact issue, and evidence so we can review the claim properly.

02 We verify first

Clear errors can be fixed quickly. Disputed claims require careful review.

03 Notes stay transparent

Substantive corrections, clarifications, and updates are labeled for readers.

04 Good faith matters

We welcome correction requests, but not threats, harassment, or pressure campaigns.

Contents

01 What counts as a correction?

Not every disagreement is a factual error. To keep things clear, we use these labels:

Correction

A factual error that needs fixing, such as a wrong name, date, statistic, quote, or description of an event.

Clarification

Wording that may be confusing or incomplete but not strictly wrong. We revise for clarity without changing the core facts.

Update

New verified information added after publication, such as a new statement, new data, or an unfolding development.

Editor’s Note

A transparency note explaining context, changes, or why a disputed claim is being handled a certain way.

We correct facts. We do not “correct” opinions simply because someone dislikes the conclusion. However, factual claims inside opinion pieces must still be accurate.

02 How to request a correction

Email us at [email protected] with the subject line Correction Request. The more specific you are, the faster we can evaluate the issue.

Please include:

  • The URL or link to the article.
  • The exact sentence or paragraph you believe is wrong.
  • What you believe is correct and why.
  • Sources or evidence, such as links, documents, screenshots, or official records.
  • Any relevant context, especially if timing matters.
If you are personally involved: Tell us your relationship to the story, such as “I am the person named” or “I represent the organization.” We may request verification before making changes.

03 How we review and respond

We evaluate correction requests in good faith and aim to respond as reasonably and promptly as we can. The review process may include:

  • Re-checking original sources and notes.
  • Consulting additional credible sources.
  • Reaching out to relevant parties for comment.
  • Internal editorial review for accuracy and wording.

High-impact claims get extra scrutiny

If a claim could significantly harm someone’s reputation, safety, or livelihood, we apply a higher verification standard. We may temporarily adjust phrasing while we verify.

We do not rush corrections for optics. We correct quickly when the error is clear, and carefully when it is disputed.

04 How we publish corrections and updates

When we correct or update an article, we aim to be transparent without cluttering the reading experience. Our general approach:

Minor corrections

Minor errors, such as typos that do not change meaning or small formatting issues, may be fixed without a public note.

Substantive corrections

If a correction changes meaning, such as names, facts, claims, numbers, quotes, or descriptions of events, we will add a clearly labeled note.

Example Correction Note

Correction, Date: We previously stated X. The correct information is Y.

Example Clarification Note

Clarification, Date: This section has been clarified to better reflect the available information.

Updates to developing stories

For evolving situations, we may add an Update note that identifies the new verified information.

Where notes appear: Typically near the top or bottom of the article, depending on what changed. If the correction materially affects the main point, we prefer placing the note near the top.

05 Edge cases and disputes

Disputes over interpretation

Some disputes are about interpretation rather than fact. In those cases, we may:

  • Add context or an editor’s note.
  • Update wording for fairness.
  • Publish a follow-up clarification or response.

Requests to remove names or details

We take privacy and safety seriously. We may remove or limit identifying details when there is a credible risk of harm, especially for private individuals. However, we do not remove accurate information solely to avoid embarrassment.

Requests from public figures or organizations

Public figures and organizations are welcome to request corrections the same way anyone else can. We may include their statement or response if it materially improves accuracy or fairness.

06 Abusive or bad-faith requests

We do not engage in harassment campaigns, intimidation, threats, or attempts to pressure us into changing accurate reporting. If a request is abusive or clearly bad-faith, we may decline to respond further.

Good faith works: The fastest way to a correction is a clear claim, clear evidence, and a respectful tone.

07 Contact

To request a correction, email [email protected] with the subject line Correction Request.

Accountability Note

Accuracy builds trust over time. Our goal is not to appear perfect. Our goal is to be honest, careful, and transparent when something needs to be fixed.